Jul. 24th, 2013

kindkit: Holmes and Watson walking arm in arm, text: I'm for you (Sherlock Holmes: I'm for you)
I've been reading some professionally published Holmes pastiche short fiction, and it seems to me that Watson is rather frequently made a scapegoat for Victorian values. Has anyone else noticed this?

Watson is more conventional than Holmes in some ways (not in all--it's Holmes, not Watson, who's been known to scoff at the idea of intelligent women), but he's not a prig. Certainly I find it very unlikely that he would fulminate against birth control and insist that if the poor can't afford more children they must learn to practice abstinence, which is what he does in the story I'm currently reading.

Profile

kindkit: A late-Victorian futuristic zeppelin. (Default)
kindkit

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
789 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 19th, 2025 02:54 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios