a nupdate

May. 1st, 2025 07:22 pm
kindkit: Stede Bonnet from Our Flag Means Death hauling a rowboat into the sea (OFMD: Stede and a rowboat)
I got my MRI results back, and as far as I can tell from googling all the medical terms (and the fact that I haven't gotten a call from my healthcare provider saying to come in immediately) I don't have cancer. I'm relieved, obviously, or at least as relieved as I can be when nobody has actually said, "Hey, you're fine." It's not fine, but it's not life-threatening or urgent.

More on the not-fine-ness under the cut. Includes reproductive anatomy, but nothing TMI, I think. Click here for more. )

So, in non-medical good news, the city moved my bus stop back to where it used to be, hooray! I was expecting the construction to go on all summer at least. It saves me close to ten minutes' walking each way, which doesn't sound like much, but which a lot of days was definitely TOO MUCH. (Partly because the route to the original bus stop mostly skirts the riverside park, which is pretty pleasant and only requires crossing a couple of streets. The route to the replacement stop ran along one of the town's main roads, with many street crossings and many drivers who neither look nor slow down before they turn. I almost got hit multiple times in just a couple of months.)

Between these two developments, I no longer feel quite so much like the last straw is incoming.


I've been reading a bit. Seeing the trailer for the Murderbot TV show made me decide to try the books again--previously I read the first two and lost interest. I still think the first book is by far the strongest, while the later ones get repetitive and wish-fulfillment-y. But I enjoyed them well enough and I'm looking forward to watching the show.

Most recently I read Freya Marske's romantasy Sword Crossed, and liked everything about it, in a popcorn sort of way, except the central romance, which irritated me intensely. But the worldbuilding is fun, and I like that it's a fantasy focused on trade and economics rather than swords and dragons.


New series of Taskmaster begins soon! Normally I would hate the idea of an American guest, but Jason Mantzoukas is so weird that I think he'll be great.


And finally: if you had asked me ten years ago who would turn out to be a better LGBTQ ally, J K Rowling or Robert de Niro, I would certainly have guessed wrong.


ETA: And my hearing seems to have recovered from the MRI. It took a couple of days, though.
kindkit: Sailing ship at sea. (Fandomless: Blue ship)
Well, back again after another loooong hiatus. I didn't mean to be silent for so long (as always), but the last 3 months have been taken up with errands and appointments of unbearable tediousness. Also, *gestures vaguely around at the state of the world*. It's been hard to do anything but look at the news and worry.

1) Name change: the various steps of this got delayed when I got a Mysterious Respiratory Illness at the end of January (more on this later) that left me tired for quite a while. But I finally managed to update my driver's license, which took 3 trips. Trip 1: Oh, I see appointments are required now. Trip 2: After waiting an hour past my appointment time, I learn that if I wait two more days, I can renew my driver's license at the same time and not have to pay twice. But it cannot be done two days early. Trip 3: Success! Also went to the bank that day to update my name on my bank account.

Note that every visit to the MVD involved an Uber, because it's far from the nearest bus and I didn't want to risk being late.

1a) No, I still don't have a car. It's been over a year now. I was waiting until I could access my retirement account (turns out I can't, I was mistaken about the age requirement), then came the US Dept of Education informing me that I still owed them $$$$$ on student loans that I thought had been rolled into the ones I was already paying, nobody having told me otherwise for EIGHT YEARS. So my monthly payments have nearly tripled. And now the price of cars is likely to skyrocket due to tariffs, so I'm not likely to have a car anytime soon. I wish public transportation here in my oh-so-progressive and environmentally aware town wasn't so awful. The latest thing is that they moved a whole bunch of bus stops due to construction, so what used to be a 20-25 minute walk between the bus stop and my work is now 30+, on a heavily trafficked and frankly dangerous road rather than being mostly a nice stroll by the park along the river. The move is temporary, but I know the pace of construction around here.

2) Reading and watching and etc. Unfortunately, the return of Trump has meant the return of my focus difficulties, and I'm finding it hard to read again. I keep bogging down. I am currently bogged down in Great Eastern, by Howard J. Rodman (a Victorian pastiche featuring Isambard Kingdom Brunel, Captain Ahab, and Captain Nemo--I'm still not sure if it's silly or Extremely Serious) and The Athenian Murders, by V. J. Randle (murder mystery set in contemporary Athens, but the murders have elements of ancient Greek religious ritual; thus far my vote is for silly despite some attempts at talking about policing, fascism, and the plight of refugees). I did manage to finish The Helios Syndrome by Vivian Shaw, she of the Greta Helsing supernatural doctor novels. This one is contemporary, with the mc a psychic who assists in the investigation of airplane crashes, and I liked it a lot right up until the utterly ridiculous ending. I also read Melissa Scott's newest Astreiant novel, Point of Hearts, with enjoyment probably based more in my longstanding love for the world than the quality of the novel itself. (To be fair, I was expecting a very different book. Based on some WIP snippets Scott posted on her Patreon, I thought it would be Istre-centric. Instead, Istre's not in it at all. Maybe that'll be the next book.)

I continue to listen to a ton of podcasts, because I have a long commute. Mostly nonfiction ones that I've talked about in previous posts, but I'm always trying to find more. Currently I'm trying out Cautionary Tales, which is basically stories of things going horribly wrong and what we can learn from them--I like the actual content a lot, but there are really irritating moments of dramatization, voiced by actors of varied abilities.

3) Health: due to length and also TW for eye surgery and different possibly serious stuff, this one's going under a cut )

4) More cheerful news? I dunno. I got a haircut today? John Oliver did a really good segment about trans athletes? (It's on YouTube.) There's going to be a third Knives Out movie?
kindkit: A late-Victorian futuristic zeppelin. (Default)
1) I am legally in possession of a new name!

The process was more awkward than it should have been, because I foolishly relied on information from a co-worker who had just changed his name, rather than calling the court to check. Co-worker told me that (a) all the hearings are over Google Meet only, and when I checked the form I was sent, it did say in small print on the bottom "All hearings are on Google Meet," and (b) the judge wouldn't ask me any detailed reasons for the change, and "personal reasons" was sufficient, which was also what the clerk told me when I was filling out the form.

I'm sure nobody deliberately misled me (my guess is that my co-worker saw a different judge with different procedures), but neither thing turned out to be quite true.

Click for more )

2) Not much else is going on. My life is dull, apart from looking at the news in ever-mounting horror.

I want to stop getting my news from Twitter, in part because I'm in the process of leaving Twitter altogether. I'd like to support actual journalism by subscribing to an actual newspaper, but my god, the options are grim. Click for more )

3) I'm not even reading much. I buy a zillion books (on sale, on Kindle, yes I know), but the general state of everything everywhere is making me hugely risk-averse when I can be. So I re-read, or look at YouTube videos of Dylan Hollis baking or the chocolate guy making fully-functional superconducting supercolliders filled with raspberry ganache, or I watch low-stakes British comedy panel shows.

However, I am reading one thing I've never read before: The Odyssey in Emily Wilson's translation. Recently Twitter had another round of ignorant right-wing douchebros giving her shit about how bad and woke her translations of Homer are, so I bought one.

Click for more )

3) A bit late to mention this, but I wrote a thing for Yuletide.

Puppets (2312 words) by kindkit
Chapters: 1/1
Fandom: Astreiant Series - Melissa Scott & Lisa A. Barnett
Rating: General Audiences
Warnings: No Archive Warnings Apply
Relationships: Philip Eslingen/Nicolas Rathe
Additional Tags: Worldbuilding
Summary: It's only an old story.


This is a story idea I may revisit at some point; there are things I'd like to explore about Astreiant's matriarchy without having a deadline at the most exhausting time of the year for me, and also not needing to keep the result suitable for gift-giving. (Basically: what if Astreiant had a men's rights movement? But even in the very different context of an actual matriarchy where men actually do have fewer rights than women, I realize that "men's rights movement" is not a phrase to necessarily spark joy.)

I don't know if it's perverse of me to want to focus on that (maybe? I tend to have the urge to pick a canon up and shake it). And I don't think Scott presents Astreiant as a utopia at all; I do however think some fans see it as one. Which requires a certain effort of will--while men in Astreiant have a lot more rights than European women did at the period the Points series is based on, the inequalities are still clear. (To be fair to utopian readers, though, the canon of the Points books is shall we say variable, so some picking and choosing is inevitable.)

If I ever actually wrote all the fics I intend to write someday . . . I'd have a lot more fics.
kindkit: Stede Bonnet from Our Flag Means Death hauling a rowboat into the sea (OFMD: Stede and a rowboat)
1) Today I filed for a legal name change, which I've been meaning to do since, oh, late 2019. Covid restrictions messed up the plan for a while, but after that it was just my own indecisiveness and procrastination. But now the thing is done. Sort of--I have to have a hearing before a judge to grant it, but that's just pro forma. So pro forma that when they gave me the forms to fill out, they specifically said that under "Reason" I could just put "personal." Which I did.

In the end, I took the cautious/cowardly way out regarding my new name: I picked names readable as gender-neutral rather than clearly masculine. I'm not worried about problems with my job or my health care, but I am worried about housing, since protection from housing discrimination for trans people doesn't exist on a federal level as far as I know, and anyway Trump + his Supreme Court lackeys will try to roll back such anti-discrimination measures as exist. (I'm morbidly curious to see what will happen with Bostock, which protects LGBTQ+ people from employment discrimination, and which was just decided in 2020. One of the judges in the majority was Trump appointee Neil Gorsuch, not because he cares about queer people but because his legal thinking is heavily focused on the text of the law, in contrast to Kavanaugh and Barrett whose legal thinking focuses on what goals Trump and/or the Federalist Society are trying to achieve. Not that Gorsuch has gone against the pack much lately.)


2) I need to change the gender marker on my driver's license, but I'm not sure whether to go with M or X. In some ways I prefer X, because in principle I think putting people's gender on identity documents is almost as weird and gross as putting race on them was. On the other hand, X will quite literally mark a person as gender-noncomforming in some way. On the third hand, I kind of feel like, well, some of us have to take some risks. I neither like nor am good at taking risks, but I'm also in a relatively safe position, and An Old to boot, and thus in a better position to take some minor risks for the sake of not rolling over and playing dead.


3) In other news, I saw Conclave today. IMO it's a very well-acted and mostly well-made film with a naive and ridiculous premise.


4) I recently read Dragon's Winter and Dragon's Treasure by Elizabeth A. Lynn, who's probably best known (at least in these fannish parts) for The Dancers of Arun. Didn't love the dragon books, didn't hate them. The story feels deeply unfinished (as in, was supposed to be a trilogy but the last bit never got written) and surprisingly conventional in all kinds of ways. Not least, sadly, the handling of queerness and queer relationships. It's a bit weird and depressing that Lynn was bolder about this in the late 1970s than she was 20 years later.

There is probably a tale to be told about how a (relative) plethora of queer sff in the 1970s/1980s just kind of faded away from the 1990s until relatively recently. I get the sense that a lot of the Kids These Days think there was no queer sff until, like, Gideon the Ninth or something.


5) Tomorrow begins a long workweek that will not end until Thanksgiving. Wish me luck.
kindkit: A late-Victorian futuristic zeppelin. (Airship)
So, I turned 55 on Monday. Like all multiple-of-5 birthdays, this one is inspiring thought. Aging, mortality, all of that extremely fun stuff. And I can no longer set it aside with "someday." Someday is now, or in the next few years, at least. (I do not have a family history of people living long lives in good health. Maybe I'll be different. Maybe not.)

It's interesting how much "What do I want the rest of my life to look like?" is a different question at 55 than even at 45. And how very much I don't feel any closer to an answer.


Anyway, I took a 4-day weekend for my birthday, which has been nice although far from long enough. I haven't done much--that was kind of the goal--but I did see an actual movie in the actual cinema for the first time since before Covid started. (It was Deadpool and Wolverine, which was slightly better than it deserved to be. I'm the wrong kind of nerd to be the ideal audience for it, and I'm pretty over the whole "mass-produced corporate entertainment product ironically poking fun at mass-produced corporate entertainment products" thing, but I still mostly enjoyed it.)

Other activities:

Reading: I'm still having trouble finding anything I really like. I keep shying away from books that are obviously going to be serious or challenging, and then resenting the books I read because they're unserious and unchallenging. More under the cut. )

Listening: Modes of Thought In Anterran Literature, by Wolf at the Door studios (with Alex Kemp as writer, showrunner, and main performer, though you have to dig deep to find cast information), which I saw recommended on Twitter. This is an audio drama consisting largely of lectures for a Classics course of the same title at Harbridge University. Anterra is an ancient civilization, dating back to approx 78,000 BCE (and no, there's not an extra zero in there), whose ruins were discovered on the seafloor after a Chinese submarine accident seven years ago.

I've listened to all the aired episodes--about 30--and I still don't know if I like it. The stuff that's actually about Anterra is interesting, and I really like the idea of an audio drama structured as a class, but the focus has increasingly shifted over towards X-Files style conspiracy stuff that doesn't interest me as much. Plus, the academic angle is just plausible enough, with a lot of actual real-world archaeological references, that my skepticism engages, and I want to know things like how the Anterran language (an unknown language, much too old to be closely related to any known ancient language, in an unknown and apparently logographic script) could possibly have been deciphered at all, let alone so quickly. And why this seemingly undergraduate introductory class has so many graduate students in it. And why the lecture topics are so random.

Randomness is the main problem, really. The show seems to be winging it, without a clear direction or a planned endpoint. Plot elements get dropped in and forgotten while new ones take over. At this point, new episodes aren't even being numbered, so I have no idea how close we are to the end, or if there is a planned ending, or what.

At the same time, I don't not recommend it? It's trying something pretty unusual, and I can respect that. It might be worth trying a few episodes to see what you think.


Watching: Nothing at the moment. But a new season of Taskmaster UK is starting in a couple of weeks!
kindkit: A late-Victorian futuristic zeppelin. (Default)
It took three full weeks, but I did eventually get over COVID, apart from a slight lingering cough. I'm hoping not to do that again, ever--and I know I had an easy case.

I'm here to talk about more interesting things, though. Namely, what I've been watching, reading, etc.

Watching:

Not much, although while I was sick I watched a lot of episodes of the British comedy panel show Would I Lie to You. It didn't really hold my interest once I was feeling better, though it is occasionally funny.

I want to see Deadpool & Wolverine, and I'd quite like to see it in the actual cinema but I'm also unwilling to risk Covid again.


Listening:

Various podcasts; specifics under the cut )


Reading

I've been reading a lot, a mix of new things when I feel up to it and re-reading of favorites (e.g. Jane Austen, Mary Renault) when I don't. I haven't entirely loved the new reading.

Specifics under the cut )
kindkit: A late-Victorian futuristic zeppelin. (Airship)
After another long silence for no good reason--mostly the feeling that nothing in my life is important enough to post about--I at last have Significant News.

To wit, I have COVID. For the first time, as far as I know.

So far it's been very mild, just tiredness, an annoying dry cough, mild intermittent sore throat, mild temperature elevation that technically doesn't quality as a fever (although it should, because my normal temperature is only about 97.5 F and I've been running about 2 degrees higher), and some tightness in the chest. I'm keeping an eye on it, of course. I have a pulse oximeter that I bought back in 2020/2021; I'll dig that out and check occasionally.

Interestingly, my symptoms started on Wednesday morning, but I got negative COVID tests on Wednesday and Thursday, and my first positive test was today. It was very, very positive though: a big bold line appeared within about 8 minutes of applying the sample.

So I'm off work until next Thursday, probably; if I continue to feel decent-ish it might be almost enjoyable.

I am, however, pissed off that after over 4 years of avoiding crowds and masking (almost) all the time indoors in public, a moment of truly pathetic weakness led to COVID.

I can't be sure, of course, but my best guess is this: Tuesday of last week, after a doctor's appointment, I wanted to go to Starbucks. I don't regularly go to Starbucks, but I had the craving. And it was a hot day, and this Starbucks had no outdoor seating that was in the shade. So I sat inside, and didn't put my mask back on between drinks because I felt silly. I was there for maybe 45 minutes tops, and wasn't sitting close to anyone. But that seems to have been enough to get whammied.

Apparently there's a new variant again and a new surge? I am an object lesson in why we should keep masking, or mask up again.


So, I'll have some time on my hands for the next week. Can anyone recommend me things? I'm more likely to get to books and podcasts than anything visual, but all recs are welcome. Preferably fairly lighthearted, preferably queer.


Here are some things I've been enjoying lately:

1) The novels of A. J. Demas. These are mostly male/male romance, set in a world based on ancient Greece, Rome, and Persia. They're fun, and there's plot beyond the romance. Some of them are a bit Tumblr-y for my taste, and unfortunately the last novel, The House of the Red Balconies, which was on track to be my favorite, ends very suddenly about 100 pages too soon. However I can recommend Honey and Pepper, and One Night in Boukos (which has two romances, one m/m and one m/f).

The author's notes link you to her other novels, written under the name (possibly her wallet name?) Alice Degan. I read one of them, From all False Doctrine. It was well-written and I enjoyed it in many ways, but it was very, very, very, very Christian. I think the Degan novels were written before the Demas books, and you can definitely see traces of a Christian worldview (specifically Christian sexual ethics) in the early Demas books. There's a lot less of it in the most recent ones.


2) The Old Bridge Inn series, by Annick Trent. Historical queer romance set in 1790s England. There are 4 books: 2 m/m novels, 1 f/f novel, and 1 f/f novella (more a short story imo). They can be read in any order, so I'd recommend trying the best two, The Oak and the Ash (m/m) and Sixpenny Octavo (f/f). These books are deeply, impressively embedded in history, and the central characters are all workers and artisans rather than rich people. The connecting thread is a "reading club" run out of the titular Old Bridge Inn, which meets for reading aloud and to which people can subscribe for a small fee and borrow books. But in the anti-revolutionary panic of 1790s England, the club is only dubiously legal even when it stays out of politics. And not everyone in it is staying out of politics.


3) Various by T. Kingfisher. I thought all of her Kingfisher books were adult books, and that the children's stuff was all published as Ursula Vernon. Turns out that's not true, but I enjoyed both of the kids' books I accidentally bought (Illuminations and Minor Mage). And I really liked Thorn Hedge, which is an adult book (a retelling of Sleeping Beauty) although sadly quite short.


4) World Gone Wrong, by Audacious Machine Creative. This is an audio drama in the form of a chat podcast that discusses the various happenings of what seems to be the ongoing end of the world. More light-hearted than it sounds, with hints that the characters are as deeply traumatized as you'd expect but are trying not to think about it. This is of course riffing off of the Covid pandemic in various ways, so a lot of the jokes are in the "it's funny because it's painfully true" category. But there's also pure silliness: the first episode tackles the question of what to do if your Pekingese dog becomes a werewolf. I've only listened to the first couple of episodes but I like it a lot so far.


5) G.O.B.L.I.N.S, a very new scripted audio drama by most of the people who made Stellar Firma at Rusty Quill. (This is not associated with Rusty Quill, just to be clear.) Features Tim Meredith, Ben Meredith, Imogen Harris, Jenny Haufek, and Amy Dickinson.

The premise is that a woman who works in planning for local government accidentally stumbles through the Veil and into a world of goblins, elves, fairies, the fae, and other such beings. Specifically, she finds herself in their equivalent of a local government planning office. Since she's stuck there until the next time the Veil thins, they offer her a job.

The show is crowdfunding right now, so there's only the pilot episode. But the pilot is very good indeed: funny, engaging, with a whole lot of worldbuilding and characterization threaded, apparently effortlessly, throughout. The pilot only seems to be available on acast, although the show itself will eventually be obtainable from all the usual suspects. You can listen here.

And if you like it, and can spare some money towards helping its staff get paid, the crowdfunder is here.


6) Speaking of Rusty Quill, I keep bouncing off of The Magnus Protocol. Not for any fault of writing or acting, but because the sound design makes portions of it incomprehensible to me. Any scenes set in the staff breakroom or outdoors have background noise, echoes, lower dialogue volume, etc. etc. and while I can see that it's realistic and atmospheric, it's hard for me to understand even listening in my relatively quiet apartment. In my more usual podcast-listening environment (walking through town, or on the bus) I can barely catch one word in four. And I guess transcripts exist but I don't want to have to look at transcripts; I want the sound design to be listener-friendly.

And, well, nothing so far (I've listened to eight episodes) has made me think the show's doing anything genuinely new with the Magnus Archives world. (If I'm wrong, let me know, okay? No need for spoilers, just tell me if you think I should keep trying with it.)
kindkit: A late-Victorian futuristic zeppelin. (Airship)
Back again after yet another longish disappearance (sorry). It's been a tougher adjustment since my car got stolen than I was really anticipating, and I feel like I'm only starting to emerge from a fog of tiredness and deep but indistinct distress.

More details under the cut )

I have done other things besides mope! Sort of. I've been reading! For instance, I've read Barbara Hambly's Sun Wolf and Starhawk fantasy trilogy, about which I have complexly mixed feelings that I won't go into here on this already-long post. And last night & today I read K J Charles's latest, Death in the Spires. It's a bit of a departure for Charles in that it's almost not a romance. (There is a love story, but it's not really central; one interesting detail is that this book has no explicit sex scenes whatsoever.) Formally it's a mystery, but really the mystery elements are pretty perfunctory. What it actually is, or wants to be, is a crime novel exploring a group of friends and how that friendship fails in various ways both before and after the crime. Charles tips her hat textually to Sherlock Holmes, but the influences I felt at work were different: Barbara Vine, Tana French, perhaps Donna Tartt. To be clear, Charles's reach exceeds her grasp here--the novel needed to be longer and to explore the characters more, particularly by giving our protagonist clearer and more consistent motivations. But my sense of Charles's most recent, oh, 6-8 books is that she's been straining at the limits of genre romance for quite a while now, and I'm happy to see her try for something beyond them. I'm curious about where she goes next. I'd actually love to see more of these characters, but I don't see how Charles could get another book out of them without abandoning even the pretext of male/male romance. I guess we shall see.

And I'm watching Taskmaster S17. Not loving the cast so far, but sometimes it takes me a while to warm up to them. And S16 is going to be a hard act to follow.
kindkit: A late-Victorian futuristic zeppelin. (Airship)
I would apologize that it's been over a month since I've posted (or, alas answered comments), except that I seem to do that so often that it's become its own routine. I've been meaning to post, really! But the stars (the desire, the time, and the energy to post) have not aligned.

Some updates under the cut, including allergies, work, shoes, books, and podcasts. It gets a bit long. )
kindkit: Man sitting on top of a huge tower of books, reading. (Fandomless--book tower)
I've recently attempted two "literary" sff novels, with mixed results.

We Who Are About To, by Joanna Russ

I kept thinking of Marion Zimmer Bradley's Darkover Landfall (which, published in 1972, pre-dates it by 5 years) as I read this; it was my first exposure to the "spaceship accidentally lands on an unknown world and colonizes it" trope. Russ's book is, you probably won't be surprised to hear, the anti-Darkover Landfall. Its protagonist is a woman who says, "fuck no, I'm not going to become a brood mare for children who will suffer to scrape a bare living in a technology-less world--I would literally rather die."

I can't say I enjoyed the book. Russ's prose is excellent and her story structure is weird but right for the story she's telling. It's just that enjoying We Who Are About To would be missing the point. It's a book about hard choices, and whether you can ever be sure that the choices you make are the right ones. It's a book about morality, fundamentally. Morality and mortality. I recommend it highly if you're in the right mental space for it.


The Two Doctors Gorski, by Isaac Fellman

This is a much more recent book, published in 2022. It makes an informative contrast to We Who Are About To; while the former is a bunch of painful questions bound together by narrative, The Two Doctors Gorski is a bunch of rather pat answers.

The protagonist, Annae, is an American just arrived in England to (she hopes) finish her doctoral work, after her studies imploded in America. She joins the lab of Dr. Marec Gorski, whose own career has been stalled for decades and who is infamously awful, but who's the only scholar who would take her on.

What she and Dr. Gorski and the book's other academics work on is magic (in Annae's case, magically removing anxiety). But magic is really a MacGuffin here; the book is fantasy with ambitions to be, as far as I can tell, a middling, liberal feminist academic novel.

More details, with spoilers, under the cut. Much is made of the ways Annae has been victimized by her former academic supervisor (who initiated a sexual relationship with her, undermined her confidence, hijacked her ideas, and did his best to ruin her career when she left him). Much is also made of how Gorski is similarly abusive. Much is made of how Annae has been damaged: her constant masking of her autism leaves her hollowed out and exhausted, she blames herself for the abuse, she's isolated, unable to work, self-harming. Her refuge is reading other people's minds without their knowledge or consent. Very little is made of this (there are a few mentions that this is perhaps unethical, but they mostly come from Annae, who is presented as self-hating). The only thing Annae ever does wrong is be too hard on herself.

The novel's theme is, I guess, "you need your "dark side"/unwanted feelings to be a whole person, and so you should forgive yourself and get therapy and do yoga." I'm not exaggerating much. The wicked or at least selfish characters in this book have academic ambitions and are interested in sex (mostly, to be fair, as a form of power); the good characters want only to help people, aren't particularly interested in sex, and go to therapy and do yoga. At the end of the book, we learn that Annae does finish her Ph.D.--but her professional focus is on teaching, with the goal of making sure her students aren't failed by the system as she was.

And . . . I mean, there's nothing wrong with that! But it's presented as the only good choice; the scholarly side of academia is the domain of abusers and psychopaths. (I was an academic. I don't recognize the version of academia in this book, although abuse certainly does happen.)

The morality of this book has no hard questions; it barely has easy ones. It's binary, black-and-white. I was particularly struck by a moment when one character proposes dealing with someone who has repeatedly caused death and other suffering due to his magic + uncontrolled anger--dealing with him in the most immediate and direct way, by killing him. Annae is horrified, and I think we're supposed to be, too. Meanwhile, the bad guy has leveled most of a town. (And shortly thereafter, the bad guy conveniently dies with no one having to do anything. It's the cheapest kind of narrative evasion.)

The Two Doctors Gorski is well-crafted on other levels, though a bit too committed to the "spare, short literary novel" aesthetic for my taste. It's got polish, which is more than I can say for a lot of things I've read lately. But at its heart, where human complexity should be, there's a sort of distilled essence of online purity culture. Ambition is bad, sex is bad, dedicating yourself 100% to the service of others is the only moral choice.

There's a gendered aspect, too, that troubles me. All the "bad" characters are men. (ETA: I should have mentioned that Annae is the ONLY woman in the book. The gender imbalance meant I kept mentally setting the story in the 1950s and then being jarred by references to Starbucks, mobile phones, and pop culture that is mysteriously the same in this world as in ours.) The two "good" characters are Annae and Ariel (a gay man, who we are specifically told is completely uninterested in sex although prone to falling unrequitedly in love; what's more, he is literally half a person, a being created to store empathy, romantic love, guilt, shame, and all the other emotions his creator found inconvenient). It raises my hackles that the implied message, for women in particular, is "Don't be ambitious. Dedicated yourself to helping others, and to self-care of course." (Again, it's not that helping others is wrong. But women always get told that!! They always get steered into low-paid, low-respected "helping" professions like social work and teaching. Even in academia itself, fields with a larger proportion of women, such as English, psychology, and biology, get less funding and are more vulnerable to adjunctification.)

I think there's a regressive strain of gender essentialism in the book, which is weeeeeird because the author, Isaac Fellman, is a trans man. I'd have expected a lot more sophistication from someone with that kind of experience. (Maybe that's not fair. Trans people can hold a whole range of views, including the essentialist, retrograde, and deeply under-analyzed. But part of the reason I wanted to read the book was because a trans man wrote it, so I am extra disappointed.)

Anyway, the whole thing made me want to read something with spaceships exploding, or a band of misfits toppling a wicked tyrant.
kindkit: A late-Victorian futuristic zeppelin. (Airship)
I'm not doing [community profile] snowflake_challenge in any systematic way, but I quite like today's Challenge #5.

Search in your current space, whether brick-and-mortar or digital. Post a picture (a link to a picture will be fine!) or description of something that is or represents:

1. Something your favorite character would like
2. Something that makes you laugh
3. A fandom place you would like to visit
4. A fandom creator (pro or not) you'd like to meet
5. Something you find comforting
6. Something from a favorite TV series or movie from your childhood
7. A piece of clothing you love
8. A book or song with a color in the title
9. Something only someone in your fandom would understand



My answers, with pictures and (if I've done it correctly) alt texts are under the cut )
kindkit: A late-Victorian futuristic zeppelin. (Airship)
1) Health

Betterish. I started back to work this past Saturday, though I haven't yet been able to work a full shift. In an ideal world I'd still be off, but I've already burned through most of my PTO and our horrible HR person was badgering me to apply for FMLA (while not actually sending me the paperwork). So pretty much as soon as I felt well enough to do dishes AND take a shower on the same day, I started back.

I'm trying to keep in mind that it's good for sciatica to move around. But that doesn't make it less painful or exhausting. So far my pattern has been "work 4 - 5.5 hours, go home and collapse in a heap, take 3 hour nap."

I thought my physical therapy started early next month, but I checked again and my first session isn't until September 19. But at this rate I don't expect to be fully recovered by then, so it'll probably do me some good anyway.


2) Our Flag Means Death

The S2 trailer has dropped. I haven't watched it. I'm hoping to avoid watching it, because so many trailers spoil important plot developments and/or the best jokes, and I'd like to go into S2 as blithely ignorant as I was for S1.

However people are already posting details about it on Twitter, the land of no cut tags. I have #OFMDS2Spoilers blocked, but of course nobody's tagging a trailer that way. The obvious solution is to stay off Twitter, but I haven't been very successful in previous attempts. (I deeply appreciate that people over here are keeping everything behind a cut.)

S2, or at least the first few episodes, will apparently release on October 5. I'm excited and nervous, because S1 was far better than I expected and it'll hurt all the more if S2 goes horribly wrong.


3) Other viewing

I've watched a few more episodes of Taskmaster, not having the brainpower for much else. I'm on S4 now, which I'm liking better than the last season.


4) Reading

Charles Stross, Escape from Yokai Land. This is an interstitial novelette in Stross's Laundry Files series. It's good grim fun, more in keeping with the tone of the early books than the much bleaker later ones. But the book centers around a lot of Japanese pop culture stuff I'm not really into, so I had a sense throughout of really not being the intended reader.

Jonathan Strahan (ed.), The Book of Witches. An anthology of short stories about witches. It's solid, with only a few choices that left me shaking my head. But there wasn't much I really loved, either. Most of the stories seemed to be riffing off traditional ideas of witchcraft rather than trying to do anything really new.

Ellen Datlow (ed.), Supernatural Noir. This is a reissue from some years back, not a new anthology. I'm only a few stories in, and so far I'm a bit disappointed. Which is more my fault than the fault of the stories--I was wanting detective stories with a supernatural element, but the anthology is delivering horror stories with a little noir atmosphere.

Terry Pratchett, A Hat Full of Sky and Wintersmith. I was feeling quite sulky, wanting to read but not in the mood for the available options, and realized finally that what I was in the mood for was Pratchett. The only adult Discworld novels I haven't yet read are a few of the silly-seeming ones (e.g. The Lost Continent) and the ones post-Unseen Academicals that I have no intention of ever reading. So I got these, having read the first Tiffany Aching book, The Wee Free Men, some time back and liked it well enough. Which is what I'll say for the next two--I like them well enough. They're recognizably Pratchett, recognizably Discworld, but very much YA Pratchett. It all feels a bit diluted, like how Italians supposedly give kids a spoonful of espresso in a cup of hot milk at breakfast. As the kids get older, the proportions change. But I'm used to the fully-caffeinated version, and while I don't mind the milky one, it's not my favorite thing.

Hmmmph, now I'm feeling sulky that as the years go by, my list of Sadly Lamented Dead Authors, Like Whom Nobody Writes Anymore, keeps growing.
kindkit: Text: Sometimes it's better to light a flamethrower than to curse than darkness. (Discworld: light a flamethrower)
Health: I'll put this under a cut.
Nothing gory or TMI, but probably not very interesting.

My sciatica flare-up continues to flare, alas. I was doing okay, actually having pretty long periods of being pain free (with the help of OTC painkillers, gabapentin, and muscle relaxants). And then on Friday at work I bent down, and something went TWANG in my back, and it was not good. I went home early and haven't been back to work since.

That weekend I started taking the leftover prednisone from my last round of this shit. I'd been hoping to avoid it because of its blood sugar effects, but that clearly wasn't going to be possible.

On Monday I got an appointment for a same-day video call visit with my doctor, but several levels of technical failure meant I had to go in instead. So I dragged my sorry ass in--for a while, driving in and having to lean over in my seat at an angle to keep the back pain under control, I wasn't sure I'd manage to get there. But I did, and got more drugs and a referral for physical therapy and a work note, and the pain eased off and was pretty bearable even when I was sitting.

So, on the way home I thought "Why don't I stop at the grocery store and pick up a few things?" I was coping okayish--in considerable but not intolerable pain--most of the way through the brief shop, and then suddenly the pain ramped way up. I gritted my teeth through checkout and carrying my bag to the car and driving home and carrying my bag up two flights of stairs to my apartment, then more or less collapsed in a heap. The rest of that day and the next were pretty bad.

It's still better than last time--I can stand, but only for a minute or two before the pain gets bad. I don't know when I'll be back to work, though. Doc prescribed me a higher dose of prednisone and I'm on day 3 of 5 for that, and I do feel a little better but not nearly as much as I was hoping for.

Doctor also gave me some exercises that I'm forcing myself to do, and a referral to physical therapy (but the PT doesn't start until the second week of September). I guess the goal of the PT isn't so much immediate rehabilitation as preventing this from happening again.

Bodies, why are they so terrible?



Reading:

I finished Peter Swanson's The Kind Worth Saving, which turned out to be less of a mystery novel and more of a novel about crime, with literary aspirations. It was fine but not as profound as it wanted to be, and I don't have any real interest in reading the previous book in the series.

I've also read most of Paul Magrs's short stories collected in Silver Jubilee. They're really a kind of fictionalized (sometimes quite heavily, with time travel etc.) memoir, and most didn't absolutely delight me. But they were interesting enough to finish. My favorite was probably "Companion Piece," in which an occasional writer of tie-ins for the cult classic TV show Iris Wildthyme* does an event at a bookstore with one of the performers from the series. It's richly textured, the fannish in-jokes aren't too jokey, and it reckons with life not turning out quite as you'd hoped in a way I found really appealing. (*Iris Wildthyme is a character of Magrs' own creation who appears in several of his Doctor Who novels. She travels the universe in a double-decker London bus.)

Currently I'm reading Blaze Me a Sun, by Christoffer Carlsson, translated by Rachel Willson-Broyles. It's one of those melancholy Scandinavian (Swedish, in this case) crime novels, but it seems to be going in interesting directions--the protagonist is a writer, and there's a strong meta level about the construction of narrative meaning. The translation's excellent as far as I can tell--it doesn't have that clunky feel that a lot of translations do.


Watching: Good Omens S2, which was hit and miss for me.
Spoilery stuff under the cut.

I'm glad Gaiman finally decided to go ahead and make the Crowley/Aziraphale relationship explicitly romantic, and that aspect of things was very well done. Unlike a lot of people, I'm not upset that S2 ends with them broken up--even if S3 never gets made, it's clear that they love each other and will probably find their way back to each other. I also appreciate the show's careful, joyful, understated inclusivity, with lots of queer people, gender-nonconforming people, angels who use wheelchairs, etc.

As a story, though, it was a hot mess. Poorly structured and poorly paced, which surprises me, because co-writer and co-executive producer John Finnemore knows how to write a supremely well-structured story in which every twist is surprising but perfectly built up to. But GO2 was just kind of a ramble, and while I often like that sort of thing, what didn't work for me here was that the show didn't embrace its rambling. It was trying to pretend to be a tight, coherent story, while actually being a lot of filler and throwaway scenes pasted together. All the flashbacks (Job, the resurrectionists, etc.) were longer than they needed to be and didn't cohere thematically. As for the zombie Nazis, the less said, the better. I was particularly annoyed by that episode because the cathedral sequence in GO1 was so beautiful and so emotionally climactic, and the weird silly gross-out zombie stuff came close to retrospectively ruining that for me.

And then there's the Gabriel/Beelzebub romance, which was a bad idea in principle and completely unearned in practice. A bad idea because, it seems to me, you don't want your B couple to have THE SAME ARC as your A couple. What's the point of showing us Aziraphale and Crowley growing closer over thousands of years, gradually changing and growing to the point where they can love each other, if we're then going to be presented with a far more rules-bound angel and demon doing the same thing in the blink of an eye? It diminishes the narrative, emotional, and even ethical weight of Aziraphale and Crowley's story, which is a damn shame. (Also, I will never stop resenting GO2 for getting that fucking song stuck in my head for days at a time.)

The ultimate unearned twist, of course, was Aziraphale's return to heaven. I didn't find it very believable at a point when we've seen him learn to defy heaven over and over again, to value the earth and humanity and above all Crowley in ways that heaven forbids. It might have worked better for me if we'd seen the temptation itself (the Metatron's conversation with Aziraphale), and of course had some buildup, but as it was, we just got a pretty damn sudden, massive about-face. I'm not saying it was entirely out of nowhere--there were little suggestions that Aziraphale was still struggling--but the story gave them nowhere near enough development. (Cf. the equivalent moment in Our Flag Means Death, which was much better built-up to and did make emotional sense for the character.)

I did like it overall, but it felt a bit like they went and filmed the first draft of the screenplay instead of the final one.
kindkit: Man sitting on top of a huge tower of books, reading. (Fandomless--book tower)
Reading: I bought (ebooks of) a bunch of titles by Paul Magrs, because he was Sad on Twitter about feeling irrelevant/left out of sff. And . . . I absolutely don't mean this in a disparaging way, but so far I think his best work is what I read first, his Eighth Doctor Adventure novels and DW short stories. I think the scaffolding of an established world and characters frees him up to be as weird and intellectually daring as he wants. In his original work he seems more constrained, like he's trying to be marketable.

Anyway. I've read his first two Brenda & Effie novels (supernatural mysteries in Whitby, investigated by two old ladies, neither of whom is quite what she seems). They're fun and have some genuinely moving moments; I'm not sure when they were first published, but I wonder if some of what seem like pretty well established tropes and plot developments now were more groundbreaking then. Recommended if you want a popcorn read with a lot of comedy and a touch of light horror.


I'm also reading The Kind Worth Saving, by Peter Swanson, a mystery about a private detective who's been hired by a wife who wants proof that her husband is having an affair; there's a second narrative track from the wife's POV as a teenage girl, in which we start to see that much, much more is going on than our detective is aware of.

So far it's an intelligent, decently written book, perhaps a bit show-offy about the fact that our main character (a former English teacher) and therefore our author have Read the Literary Classics. However it is book 2 of a series; normally in mysteries that doesn't matter much, but I seem to have missed important character backstory, and also there seem to be major spoilers in this book for the plot of the first one. I'll have more opinions once I've read it all.


Listening: I'm most of the way through S3 of Old Gods of Appalachia, and I think I may be becoming a bit, er, disenchanted. The show seems to be becoming less creative as it goes on and reveals more of the world.
More on this under the cut; it's not super spoilery, being mostly focused on premise and metaphors, but may be more spoilery than you'd like.

Most of the magic has turned out to be based in bog-standard European neopaganism (Cam Collins leans heavily into this in the episodes she writes, Steve Shell less so in his), with a layer of borrowings from Lovecraft. The neopaganism is there in both the premise (the green vs the dark) and a lot of the details like a witch's ritual knives. I don't want to overstate this--it's not The Mists of Avalon, though honestly I think there's a resemblance now and then--but when the magic gets weirder and more specific, like the Man from the Railroad, I like it better.

There's also a lot of reliance on tropes that I find dull at best and dodgy at worst. The whole darkness = evil thing is a well known pitfall in horror, and I think could have been easily avoided here by using more creative metaphors. And I really, really dislike the presence and the growing importance of magical bloodlines. I can understand, from a storytelling perspective, why having groups of interrelated characters is useful. But the trope comes with heteronormative baggage and potentially even some "blood and soil" bullshit. To be clear, I think the creators are doing their absolute best to avoid going there. But I'd rather they had thought deeper into their magical system and avoided the problem by avoiding this fraught trope.

The show's critique of capitalism and big corporations is appealing, of course, but not always well thought out in worldbuilding terms. (If you're the head of a powerful corporation, why would you do a deal with monsters that results in you being so isolated from the world that you can't enjoy your wealth and power? Conversely, if you have deals with dark gods going on, why bother with union-busting? It seems a bit petty.) And at times it veers into "development is bad because it's bad," territory, which I don't always care for. Sometimes, more and easier movement between rural areas and the rest of the world is good, actually.

On a more petty level, I'm tired of confrontations that are either video game levels or boss fights. And if I can spot it, as ignorant of video games as I am, it must be really, really obvious to other listeners.

I'm still listening to Old Gods, but I don't have as high hopes for it as I did.




Watching: nothing, though I do want to see both Barbie and Oppenheimer. Barbie I'll probably end up waiting to watch on stream, because I like to see movies alone but I do NOT want to be a solo middle-aged man at the Barbie movie. As for Oppenheimer . . . I'm not really that interested, but some of the reaction has gotten my back up.
Under the cut, a bit of a rant and some probably unpopular opinions.Some people are on very high horses about how the bombing of civilians in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a war crime, as though the whole of the Second World War wasn't one long war crime.* And as though Japan didn't commit systematic atrocities against civilians throughout its conquered Asian territories, atrocities that Japanese governments have mostly refused to even admit to while burnishing up the image of innocent Japan every time those August anniversaries roll around.

(*The Allies deliberately bombed civilian areas in Germany and Japan as much as possible, because destroying Axis industrial capacity was key to winning the war. One way you destroy industrial capacity is by making workers homeless, hungry, exhausted, and if possible, dead. And the awful thing is, we'd still better all be glad the Allies won, because the other side was a thousand times worse.)

Other people are bringing up the way the Manhattan Project kicked Hispanos off the lands they'd farmed and ranched for generations (bad, but I also keep wanting to ask how their Spanish conquistador ancestors got that land and who they took it from). And the suffering, from cancer and other radiation-induced illnesses, of thousands of down-winders. As though Oppenheimer somehow was personally responsible for all this. As though, maybe, winning the fucking war--and the Nazis were working on an atomic bomb too, they were just bad at it--wasn't so overwhelmingly important that the US accepted the suffering and death of millions, including a lot of young men who were conscripted into the military whether they liked it or not.

I know there's significant debate among historians about whether dropping the atomic bombs was necessary. I don't follow it closely enough to know all the arguments and evidence, but I suspect the truth lies somewhere around "not absolutely necessary, but it saved a lot of Allied lives and probably Japanese lives too."

Anyway, I'm baffled by the moralism of people who can, eighty years after the fact, lament that we didn't keep our hands clean when fighting a total war against opponents who in one case didn't object to committing genocide, and in the other case deliberately embraced it as a goal.

Wars are bad. Wars ARE atrocity. But sometimes, winning them prevents worse.

(To be clear: I want the US to massively cut its military spending. I want everyone to eliminate nukes. I want wars not to happen. I want honesty from the US government about the effects of atomic testing and proper compensation for injured people or their survivors. It's just the fucking "oh, the US is so guilty, guilty" thing that I can't stand. It reminds me a bit of those self-described leftists who support Putin's Russia because the US is a nasty imperial power. Yes, we fucking are. And Putin is doing his best to be bigger and nastier, not to mention ruling his own country as an outright dictatorship. Supporting Russia is not progressive and to hell with Glenn Greenwald, his fellow travellers, and all the deluded tankies who think he has a point.)


So, yeah, apparently I'm a little bit pissed off. I didn't realize I had that much of a rant in me until I started writing it. My original point was that I mostly want to see Oppenheimer as a fuck-you, which may not be strong enough motivation to actually see it.
kindkit: Man sitting on top of a huge tower of books, reading. (Fandomless--book tower)
1) I finished Melissa Scott's The Master of Samar, and enjoyed it a lot while wishing it had had one more round of revisions. There's some important stuff (mostly character-related but also plot) that isn't set up properly before suddenly appearing in the last couple of chapters. Nevertheless, I like what it does, and I especially like
Vague spoilers follow; click here to seeScott's willingness to give us a culture that's both fucked up (patriarchal, homophobic, hierarchical) and threatened by a collapse that would be worse. I like that preventing devastation comes at a cost, and that the cost is very much felt and somewhat resented. I like that the relationship between Irichels and Envar is well-established, stable, trusting, drama-free, and that a situation many other authors would have milked for every drop of sweet sweet angst is treated matter-of-factly.


Thinking about how The Master of Samar is actually helping me get at something I couldn't articulate in my last post: part of the reason some contemporary sff feels "fanficcy" to me in a not-enjoyable way is that the emotional stakes are just too high. Everything's turned up to 11, all the time. Don't get me wrong, I want characters to have emotions and for those emotions to matter. But the centering of those emotions all the time, this constant incredibly intense round of despair and joy and jealousy and rejection and etc etc., feels very . . . teenage. And meanwhile the world needs saving, the revolution needs revolution-ing!

I guess this is why I like middle-aged characters. Not that I'm never drawn to the ones with intense emotions sometimes (see: Teach, Edward), but they've also got some good repression skills going on and can usually turn the drama back down again for a while.

Anyway, yeah. Fanfic, both reading it and writing it, trains us to go for as many intense emotions as can be crammed onto the page, and it's not entirely a good thing.


2) Still listening to Old Gods of Appalachia, still really enjoying S2 despite some trepidation. There are political implications to this arc that I'm trusting Collins and Shell to handle thoughtfully; we'll see.


3) I saw a post on Tumblr with a Saturday Night Live promo pic of Daniel Craig (I think it's from a few years ago), that people were explaining visually references the infamous 1974 French sex* film Emmanuelle. And I thought to myself, self, you have never seen this infamous French sex film.

So I acquired it, and watched it, and it's a tremendously silly and pompous film except when it's promoting rape culture. Interesting as a document of its times, I think, and with a few embedded critiques of cishet-male-centered sexual liberation that disturb the rest of the bullshit in useful ways, but ultimately deeply unsexy. I went to Wikipedia afterwards and learned that the novel it's based on has a gay man and male/male(/female) homoeroticism in a central role; the film took all that out and substituted a rape scene. Color me surprised.

(ETA: *I wouldn't really call it porn. Maybe the softest of softcore. All the sex is simulated, no more graphic than a modern R-rated movie and often less. There's a lot of nudity--all female, no dicks on display--and one notorious scene set at a Thai sex show, in which a Thai woman smokes a cigarette with her vagina. That's graphically shown; nothing comparable was asked of the western actors. Besides everything else, the film has a massive unexamined freight of colonialism.)

Anyway, my point in bringing this up was this: you know the much-GIFed scene from Hannibal where Will is standing against a ladder and Hannibal approaches close to him and it's all very breathless and eroticized? It's a direct visual quotation of a scene in Emmanuelle where our heroine is seduced by a woman for the first time. I'm sure I'm not the first person to notice it, but I'm entertained.
kindkit: A late-Victorian futuristic zeppelin. (Default)
1) Relevant to my interests and perhaps to yours is Kai Ashante Wilson's essay Whither Queer: a Genre At Midlife and a Rec-List. Wilson looks at an issue I've talked about a lot: the historical lack of queer male characters in sff, and the current glut of queer male characters . . . written by and largely for women.

I had moments of intense recognition reading this piece (Judith Tarr! making note of books with queer men and hoping to stumble into them in used book stores!), and also moments of disconnect, because I've been involved in fic fandom for 20 years and Wilson has not; he is intensely skeptical of the influence of fanfic on contemporary sff. I hate it when people use "fanfic" to mean "writing I don't like," and Wilson does a certain amount of that here. He never entirely specifies what these fanficcy tendencies in sff are, either.

And yet, I can't say I entirely think he's wrong. When I read contemporary sff by younger authors (not just the queer male stuff, either), it does feel fanficcy to me, in ways I too find hard to pin down but often don't love. I read the first few paragraphs of Gideon the Ninth in a sample somewhere and bounced hard off that fanfic voice. (One of the few specific things Wilson mentions is ironic banter.) A lot of m/m relationships in contemporary sff are written using fanfic tropes and a kind of fundamental narrative structure or assumption that, again, I can't pin down, but it feels like slash fic to me. *shrugs*

I think part of what gets my hackles up, when people use "it's like fanfic" as criticism, is that I immediately think of the kinds of fanfic I enjoy. I forget that there's a ton of fanfic I don't enjoy but that is hugely popular, and that, I fear, is what's influencing professionally published sff these days. Anyway, I'd love to hear what other folks think of Wilson's piece.

As for his recs list, there's not much on it that I didn't know about, but I'm pleased to see Melissa Scott there (twice!)--Wilson's criticism of "the female gaze" in queer-male-focused sff does not boil down to "doesn't like women writers"--and also trans male writer Billy Martin (publishing as Poppy Z. Brite). Wilson's discussions of all the books are illuminating--I may have to give Water Horse another try--even if you don't agree with his general approach.


2) Samba Schutte, the actor who plays Roach in Our Flag Means Death, has designed an awesome t-shirt to raise money for True Colors United, an organization that fights homelessness among LGBTQ youth. OFMD-inspired without quite being referential (or copyright-infringing; I doubt David Jenkins would object but HBO/Max is evil). Beware the checkout process, though--it steers you hard to sign up for Shop Pay, a Shopify-based instant payment thing. You can avoid it by checking out as a guest, but I got confused and managed to sign myself up accidentally. Must remember to de-activate it once my order has processed.
kindkit: A late-Victorian futuristic zeppelin. (Airship)
Reading: For now at least, I've DNF-ed Katie Daysh's Leeward. It wasn't doing anything for me, and I mean that literally. I felt nothing for any of the characters and none of the story development, such as there has been, caught my eye. (I know I've said I want slow, less plotty stories. Did a monkey's paw twitch somewhere? For a slow story to work, other things about it--characters, worldbuilding, language--have to be awesome. In Leeward, they're . . . not. And the pacing manages to be both slow and too fast--nothing happens for pages and pages, then emotionally important moments flash past with neither preparation nor adequate follow-up.) I may give it another chance at some point, because I admit I've been tired and not concentrating well. But I don't have high hopes.

Melissa Scott's new novel Master of Samar came out, and I've started that. This isn't an Astreiant novel, but it's of the Astreiant type, with urban life and magical systems out of European history (except they actually work), and a mystery to solve. Since I didn't love Water Horse, Scott's foray into epic fantasy, I'm glad we're back to the kind of thing Scott does well. Her strengths are here, and so are her flaws (functional prose, characters who aren't very distinctly drawn); she's a long-time favorite writer of mine, who was writing queer sff before almost anybody else, and I will forgive things from her that might have me DNF-ing somebody else's book.


Other media: Apparently Rusty Quill's podcast Cry Havoc, which they announced as TMA was ending, finally dropped? I've seen good reactions but haven't listened yet. I don't know if I will. I'm troubled by things I know RQ has done, and I don't 100% believe the other accusations but I don't 100% disbelieve them either. And regardless of their ethics, they've pretty thoroughly demonstrated an inability to make a worthy follow-up to either The Magnus Archives or Rusty Quill Gaming. *shrugs* If it's still around in a year and people still like it, maybe then.

I have gotten back into podcasts somewhat, because I'm back to taking walks 5 days a week and needing something to listen to. Mostly I'm still working my way through the large backlog of the British science podcast The Curious Cases of Rutherford and Fry, but I've also started listening to S2 of Old Gods of Appalachia.

I had mixed feelings about S1 of Old Gods. It was impressive storytelling and technically well-made, with a strikingly unique voice created by the use of the accents and speech patterns of southern Appalachia (where podcast creators Steve Shell and Cam Collins grew up), and a mythos that builds wild, interesting new things on a Lovecraftian foundation. But it was so violent and so gory that I often had a hard time listening.

S2, so far, has been less violent and gory while keeping all the things I loved. I'm liking it a lot. (Sadly, I don't think I can recommend starting with S2, because the stories are connected and S1 does a lot to set up the mythos.) If you're less of a wimp than me, you may not find S1 hard going anyway.

I've tried a couple of other podcasts with less happy results. I keep wanting to listen to Pseudopod (which is a genuine anthology horror series, hosted mostly by the lovely Alasdair Stuart), but I bounce off the amateurish writing of the contemporary stories every single time. (There was a trans rights episode a couple of months ago, which of course I listened to, but it was awful.)

I also listened to the first episode of Malevolent, which has been praised here and there, but again I found the writing really clumsy, full of infodumps and the most awkward rationale for narrating everything that I've ever heard. (Audio drama podcast folks: please just take the audio format for granted. The audience isn't going to ask "why is this well-told, cool story being narrated?" any more than they'll ask "why can I see these people planning their big heist or having an intimate conversation?" about a movie. They will suspend disbelief if you give them the space to do so!) Anyway, if Malevolent gets better, please tell me.

I haven't watched any TV or movies. I keep wanting to go back to seeing movies in the cinema (I'll mask, as I mask everywhere public and indoors) but every time I check there's nothing good playing.

ETA: Make that no TV apart from Taskmaster. Which I'm still enjoying, but my watching has slowed a bit because it does start feeling same-y if you watch too many episodes in a row.
kindkit: A late-Victorian futuristic zeppelin. (Airship)
Moby Dick is a hard act to follow, and I tried several things that didn't sustain my interest. I'll probably go back to them eventually and won't talk about them here.

Recently finished:

I re-read the first three books of Melissa Scott and Jo Graham's Order of the Air series (Lost Things, Steel Blues, and Silver Bullet) and read the other two (Wind Raker and Oath Bound) for the first time. The series is technically unfinished, but it's been a while, so . . . who knows.

For the unfamiliar, the series is set in the 1930s and involves a group of pilots (most of them First World War veterans) who are also magicians. Magic in this world is based on real-world occult practices, so there are a lot of little groupuscules with their own traditions and ties. But there's also a broad coalition of groups who want to protect the world, and some other groups that are not so nice. (Yes, Nazi occultism becomes a plot factor in later books.)

Anyway, I liked the first three a little better on re-reading then previously, in part because I knew what to expect and what not to expect. (Expect: a prevalence of het, lovingly and perhaps excessively detailed aviation technicalities, a tendency for carefully set up plot points to get resolved undramatically in a couple of pages. Do not expect: the extensive queerness or worldbuilding depth of Scott's other books.) The later two books deepen the worldbuilding, but in directions I found both silly and kind of troubling, brushing a little too closely to the idea that some special people have an eternal destiny to be heroes. I tend to think these things were among Graham's contributions, if only because Melissa Scott is one of my favorite sff authors and Jo Graham . . . is not. Also, Graham's other books that I'm familiar with lean into that kind of thing.

Anyway, they were fine, I didn't hate them, but I didn't like them very much either. They didn't scratch my itch for the Points novel Scott's been working on for years, which hopefully will see the light of day eventually.


Currently reading:

In the end, I decided the only way to follow Melville was with more Melville, so I'm working my way through some of his short fiction. So far I've read "The Piazza," "Bartleby the Scrivener," and "Benito Cereno." "Bartleby" was inflicted on me in high school when I was far too young to get anything from it (and I was, for high school, a pretty sophisticated reader), and I've read "Benito Cereno" before too, maybe in college. (All I remember of it was the basic premise and my fury at discovering that was I thought was the end of the story wasn't, and there was an additional ten pages of "court documents" to get through.)

At this point I think I'm getting a sense of the Melvillean Story, which is "people are behaving really weirdly, and I will offer you a rational explanation but it will be unsatisfactory and inadequate in ways I'll probably point out, and you'll be left wondering why even are people anyway and whether there might be a malevolent divinity that shapes our ends."

"Benito Cereno" follows this basic structure, but goes far beyond it, just as Moby Dick does in a different way.
Some spoilery discussion follows. Perhaps best skipped if you haven't read the story but plan to. It's the only story I can think of offhand where everything important is between the lines. It's about what isn't seen. It's about what still isn't seen even when the ostensible mystery--Benito Cereno is being so weird because the enslaved people aboard his ship have risen up and taken over--is revealed. The violence of the rebellion has been in semi-plain sight throughout, but the violence of slavery itself remains invisible to our spectacularly unreliable narrator Captain Delano and even perhaps to us as readers. We can see the traces of it if we look attentively: in the despair and furtive sullenness of the captive Spanish and the violence required to control them, in the "love" and "devotion" of Babo for Cereno that echoes Delano's self-congratulatory affection for "negroes," in the ferociousness of the Spanish revenge and their later official justice, and perhaps most chillingly in a throwaway half-sentence where Melville notes that the enslaved women among the rebels wanted the Spanish to be tortured to death, not just thrown overboard. But Melville's not going to push that knowledge on us if we refuse to see it.

In fact so deep and layered are Melville's ironies and indirections that the story uncomfortably defies any attempt at confident conclusions. It's an anti-slavery story, yes, but is it (as the editor of my edition claims) anti-racist as well? Melville coolly dismantles certain racist stereotypes, the pseudo-affectionate ones about Black people as natural servants who love their masters. Melville's rebels are angry, intelligent, rational people who want to go home, and who'd also like a little bit of revenge for what they've suffered. But we never hear their voices. We never hear of friendship and love among them, except in one brief moment of a Black woman holding her baby (which Delano simultaneously romanticizes as noble savagery and dismisses as animal instinct). We never know their stories. Is the silencing of their voices the point (another truth we can't perceive, aren't allowed to perceive by the narrative that structures our entire understanding)? Or did Melville just never even think of it? I don't know.

I do know that I won't soon forget the image of that picked-white skeleton fastened to the bow, where the figurehead of Columbus once was, with the words "Follow your leader." Or the closing image of Babo's dead eyes staring, staring at Benito Cereno's monastic haven until Cereno follows him into death.



Reading next: The rest of this Melville collection. Including Billy Budd, which was also inflicted on me in high school and which I haven't read since.
kindkit: Man sitting on top of a huge tower of books, reading. (Fandomless--book tower)
I haven't done one of these in a minute. I have been reading, just not posting about it.

Recently finished

All four volumes extant of Rosemary Kirstein's Steerswoman series (The Steerswoman, The Outskirter's Secret, The Lost Steersman, and The Language of Power). These were recommended to me so long ago that I can't remember who recommended them. So long ago that they weren't available as ebooks and hard to get hold of in physical form, which is why I didn't read them sooner.

The first book in the series was published in 1989, the most recent in 2004. Supposedly there are two more on their way, but book 5 has been forthcoming at least since 2015 so I'm not holding my breath to see it any time soon. This means the story is very much unfinished.

Anyway, our main character Rowan is a Steerswoman, which means she travels around gathering information (in particular, mapping; Steerswomen are particularly engaged in finding what lies beyond their small patch of known lands). She must truthfully answer any question put to her to the best of her knowledge, and in turn, anyone she asks a question of is required to answer truthfully or be placed under the Steerswomen's ban, which means no Steerswoman will ever again answer any question the offender asks. Since Steerswomen have both a lot of useful knowledge and enormous cultural prestige, most people avoid this penalty.

Except wizards. Wizards have lots of knowledge that they refuse to share. They're constantly at war with each other and generally seem to be up to no good. The first book opens with Rowan accidentally running afoul of a wizard through what seemed like a trivial line of research, and all the subsequent books trace out her process of finding out what's going on and trying to work out how to deal with it.

There's a lot I like about these books. I like the centrality of thought and analysis, I like that Rowan is a character who isn't great with people and doesn't get a whole lot better at it, I like the moral complications that develop, and despite my frustration at its being unfinished, I very much like the slow pace of the story. There's plenty in here that doesn't particularly serve the plot, and I'm delighted about that! (Though a few things I thought were passing incidents/characters did turn back up later in more plot-relevant form.) I like Kirstein's writing style, which is plain and straightforward but manages, somehow, to be like nothing I've read before. I like the physicality of the world, and particularly the physicality of travel. Places that take days or weeks to get to, take days or weeks to get to. In some cases they take whole books. And Kirstein can do atmospheric extremely well without pushing too far into landscape description (something I have a very hard time following) or Too Many Adjectives. The long sequence in the third book when Rowan travels alone through the demon-haunted coast is a tour de force.

There's not much I don't like, but I do have to dishonorably mention that the first three books appear to take place in the World Without Queer People. There's a glancing mention of f/f sex in book 1 (so glancing that for quite a while, in the absence of any other mentions, I assumed I had misread the passage in question), but that's all. Then, in book 4, we get queerness. Sort of. Specifically, we get 2 mentions of queer sex as a possibility (both in the context of wizards, and both in the context of the sexual exploitation of vulnerable young people by wizards, so, um, not great?). We get one very elderly lesbian couple, and one man who is queer-coded, but implied to be unrequitedly in love with his best friend (who is happily married to a woman). I could just about excuse this nonsense in 1989 (just about--Melissa Scott was publishing sff with queer protagonists by then) but to have only Bad Queers, Sad Queers, and One Elderly and Thoroughly Desexualized Token Queer Couple in 2004 looks a bit gutless.

But apart from that (. . . Mrs. Lincoln), I liked the books a lot.


I also recently finished The Half Life of Valery K, the 2022 novel by Natasha Pulley (best known for The Watchmaker of Filigree Street). HLVK, whose titular character is a radiation biologist pulled out of a Soviet gulag and assigned to work on studying an irradiated ecosystem, is another book I'm ambivalent about. I read it fast, with great engagement, and enjoyed it a lot. But I still think it's kind of a mess. Pulley's fondness for mixing romance with big events works better in Watchmaker, where the events are explicitly fictional and indeed science-fictional, than it does in HLVK when the book centers around a real-world Soviet nuclear accident that occurred in 1957, killing untold people and leaving the land still polluted today. The tender, literally unspoken romance that develops between Valery and the kindly KGB officer (yes, really) who's head of site security doesn't mesh with the stakes of the story at large.
Slightly spoilery bit under the cut, not very detailed.And in the end, when Pulley apparently writes herself into a corner and has to decide which story to conclude, she chooses the romance. In fact the ending feels tacked on anyway, too hasty and too improbable, with an almost literal deus ex machina by a character whom readers of other Cold War books will recognize.


HLVK also has these spotty moments of gender analysis that (a) I'm not sure I believe coming from this main character, and (b) don't go anywhere. Things not going anywhere happens a lot.

It's not a bad book. Like I said, I read it with a lot of enjoyment. But Natasha Pulley feels like a writer who hasn't moved on from the acclaim and success of Watchmaker. Since then she's been retreading the same ground, either with other books in the same universe or with HLVK, which feels like essentially the same kind of story, particularly the same character types, just shifted out of sff and into realistic fiction. (I think? There was a moment when I thought Pulley suggested an alternate history--there's a passage that seems to have WWII beginning in 1937 with Hitler declaring war on the Soviet Union--but then nothing came of it.)

The thing is, I think Pulley's a really skillful writer who can do better things. I want her to keep including queer men and love between queer men (though she could lose the habit of making the romances depend upon the self-sacrifice of women), but to move on to new kinds of strange, bold stories.

I should note that I haven't read her 2021 novel The Kingdoms yet; maybe that's the kind of thing I'm hoping for.


Currently reading

I haven't quite settled to anything. I started a book by Adrian Tchaikovsky but it opened with a big battle scene that I wasn't in the mood for. What I am in the mood for is a good mystery novel, but my taste in mysteries is very particular. I wish Reginald Hill could have lived to be about 110 and kept on happily producing good novels 'til the end.


Reading next

See above. At some point I do want to read Pulley's The Kingdoms, but I want to give it a bit more time so I come to it less influenced by Valery K.
kindkit: Man sitting on top of a huge tower of books, reading. (Fandomless--book tower)
Reading now: I'm between books at the moment.


Recently finished: I have finished Moby Dick at last! I'm still mulling it over, and I'll probably re-read it at some point, because I know there was a lot going on structurally and thematically that I didn't fully catch. I knew the basics of how the plot resolved, of course, because it's seeped into pop culture. But the actual ending, the epilogue and especially that last sentence, is still echoing in my head. And I'm pondering why abridged editions of Moby Dick exist, because it's not an abridge-able novel. The things that aren't plot, the asides and diversions and whale facts, are where most of the actual story resides.

After that, I wanted something light, so I tried Cairo Malachi and the Adventure of the Silver Whistle, a m/m romance by Samantha Sorelle. The opening sentence is: "The first time I met the love of my life, he died in my arms," so it's got a bold premise going for it. The main character is a (fraudulent) medium, and his love interest is indeed a ghost. It's a fun book, which does some fun things and is pretty original within its genre limits. But as a reader, I've been chafing at the genre limits of m/m romance for some time. What I really want is books that are fully-fledged books in their genre (sff, mystery, historical) with deep worldbuilding and complex characters and enough plot to hold the rest together, that also include m/m love stories. Also, ideally, prose that's got a little life in it and isn't just functional. There are very few of these books. (Several of Natasha Pulley's books just about hit the sweet spot for me, problematic as they are in certain ways *coughOrientalismcough*. Wish there were more by other writers. Preferably including queer male writers. Seriously, where are the queer men writing genre? I know publishing gets more awful by the minute, and there's a glut of cheap self-pubbed m/m mostly by women that's maybe pushing other types of m/m stories out of the market. But it's frustrating.)

Anyway, despite my complaints above about wanting more substance, I was still in the mood for something light so I also read Legends and Lattés, by Travis Baldree. This is a cute little story, completely unabashed about its roots in TTPRGs, about Viv, an orc fighter who retires from adventuring and opens a coffee shop in a city that's never heard of coffee. Baddies try to baddie, but new and old friends help Viv out, and there's community and love and all that stuff. It's . . . nice? Not really fully satisfying to me, because I am a picky asshole, but it's a sweet, fluffy cinnamon roll of a story. Which is exactly what it intends to be.


Reading next: Maybe Natasha Pulley's The Half Life of Valery K, about Soviet nuclear science and, apparently, gay love. Or maybe I'll finally start The Steerswoman, which I've had for a while now. I've also recently acquired the 4th and final volume of The Department of Truth. Might give that a go today, since I've been wanting to see how it turns out.

Profile

kindkit: A late-Victorian futuristic zeppelin. (Default)
kindkit

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 15th, 2025 07:12 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios