kindkit: A late-Victorian futuristic zeppelin. (Airship)
[personal profile] kindkit
Has anybody seen hard data on whether, and to what degree, low-income white voters went for Trump? I've found lots of statistics broken down by race, education, income, etc., and some combined data (race + education or race + sex), but I haven't seen race + income anywhere.

The stereotype is that Trump's base was poor and working class whites, but other statistics do not seem to bear this out: a significant majority of people with incomes under $50,000 voted for Clinton. But I'd like to see those numbers broken down by race. (There's also a weird demographic twist where the less education a voter--especially a white voter--had, the more like s/he was to vote Trump. But the income figures are basically the opposite, and I'm wondering who all these less-educated rich people are.)

Date: 2016-11-09 06:53 pm (UTC)
cesperanza: (Default)
From: [personal profile] cesperanza
Finally, and this shouldn’t be ignored either, the relatively well-to-do went for Trump. According to the exit-poll figures, people who earn less than fifty thousand dollars a year—who make up a bit more than a third of the population—voted for Clinton over Trump by a margin of about eleven points, fifty-two per cent to forty-one per cent. The roughly two-thirds of the population who earn more than fifty thousand dollars a year voted for Trump. The margin was considerably smaller, but because there are a lot more of these voters their numbers were enough to pull the Republican tycoon to victory.

http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/how-donald-trump-became-president-elect

Profile

kindkit: A late-Victorian futuristic zeppelin. (Default)
kindkit

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
789 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 31st, 2026 11:08 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios