Oct. 26th, 2013

kindkit: Two British officers sitting by a river; one rests his head on the other's shoulder. (Fandomless: officers by a river)
Today's Guardian includes the results of a project created by British poet laureate Carol Ann Duffy, who invited contemporary poets to respond to the work of First World War poets.

There's a hint of arrogance about the project that troubles me: the original poems responded to a horrific and unprecedented kind of warfare. There is nothing, nothing comparable in modern experience, and I'm not sure we can adequately or honestly respond to the art of that time. Especially in those cases where people can't be bothered to get the history right; Carol Ann Duffy's expression, in her poem's introduction, of sadness at the death of Wilfred Owen "during the second world war" makes me wince.

Even when more thought seems to have been put in, some inadequacy or incommensurability shows up in the modern poems, which are almost uniformly less interesting than the originals. The best ones work with that historical distance, contextualizing the war within modern concerns. I recommend Simon Armitage's "Avalon" (responding to Ivor Gurney), Blake Morrison's "Redacted" (responding to Ewart Alan Macintosh), Daljit Nagra's "The Calling" (responding to Sarojini Naidu), and particularly Andrew Motion's "A Moment of Reflection" (responding to Siegfried Sassoon), which I found the most satisfying, poetically, of the modern poems. But I must admit to my bias: I don't generally like contemporary poetry, so I may not be the ideal audience for these modern revisitings.
kindkit: Haddock and Tintin kissing; Haddock is in leather gear (Tintin: gay icon)
It seems today is going to be the day when I post enough to make up for the almost two weeks since I last posted.

So. This photo of Cary Grant lighting Randolph Scott's cigarette with his own (on the beach, in the twilight) may be the most romantic image I have ever seen.

click here to see )

And this was a publicity photo! Arranged and paid for by the studio, which wanted to emphasize the supposedly un-Hollywood-like quiet domesticity of Grant and Scott's lives as housemates. It's got to be the definition of "hiding in plain sight," and I imagine the studio just wanted to deflect the suspiciousness of two wealthy, successful movie stars choosing to live together. Still, I'm not sure the message these photos actually send--which is pretty much "we're in love!"--is quite the one the studio intended.

Profile

kindkit: A late-Victorian futuristic zeppelin. (Default)
kindkit

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627 28293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 29th, 2025 01:48 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios