history?

Mar. 11th, 2010 09:46 pm
kindkit: Text: im in ur history emphasizin ur queerz (Fandomless: Queer history)
[personal profile] kindkit
Does this supposedly vintage photo of two men holding hands on a beach look photoshopped to anyone else?

To me, the sepia tone implies a much older image than the haircuts and clothes, which look no older than the 1960s and possibly much more recent than that. (You could see guys dressed like this by a Minnesota lake any summer, although they probably wouldn't be holding hands.)

ETA: In browsing back through the site, I found a couple of posts mentioning the fact that they do "digitally restore" their images (with inclusion of the original images for comparison). The restored images all feature sepia tone even when the originals don't. *frowns*

It's still a cool picture, but the attempt to make it look more "antiquey" irritates me, as does the fact that all these historical images are being posted with no indication of provenance or date. I recognize some of the images as taken from books, too.

Profile

kindkit: A late-Victorian futuristic zeppelin. (Default)
kindkit

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627 28293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 16th, 2025 09:53 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios