dismay and a question
May. 3rd, 2012 11:02 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I have not actually watched Downton Abbey and have no intention to, but yesterday I learned, through other sources, that (sort of spoilery I guess):(skip) the only queer character is a selfish, amoral villain.
Has anyone perchance critiqued this approach? I feel like what I've mostly seen all over the internets is either "OMG Downton Abbey is so great, yay!" or "Downton Abbey is a silly soap opera," but no "Let's talk about problematic and stereotypical representation." Admittedly, though, I haven't been looking for it.
Has anyone perchance critiqued this approach? I feel like what I've mostly seen all over the internets is either "OMG Downton Abbey is so great, yay!" or "Downton Abbey is a silly soap opera," but no "Let's talk about problematic and stereotypical representation." Admittedly, though, I haven't been looking for it.
Re: The following may be spoilery.
Date: 2012-05-03 11:40 pm (UTC)The show could use more queer characters, though. I hope next season brings us a scandalous, trouser-wearing lesbian poet who Edith starts having feelings for. That would be in perfect keeping with the show's tropeyness. It's a sad fact that I can't think of a single 1920s trope for a neutral or positive portrayal of a non-straight man - they tended to be framed as debauched or weak-natured. The best thing would be if the show stepped outside of the tropes-only rule and gave us a non-tragic queer male genius of some stripe, and made Cora/O'Brien canon, but I'm not holding my breath.
Re: The following may be spoilery.
Date: 2012-05-04 12:01 am (UTC)Re: The following may be spoilery.
Date: 2012-05-04 01:25 am (UTC)Re: The following may be spoilery.
Date: 2012-05-04 01:31 am (UTC)Re: The following may be spoilery.
Date: 2012-05-04 01:42 am (UTC)Will do!