Wednesday reading meme
Jan. 25th, 2017 03:31 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
kindkitCurrently reading: I've been re-reading the Aubrey and Maturin books, because I'm in a mood where I have to feel very, very confident that I'm going to like a book (and that it won't betray me with things like "Oh by the way this character you've been reading as queer is totally 120% straight") or I don't want to bother with it. I'm in the middle of The Thirteen Gun Salute right now and still enjoying almost everything on this third reading.
Recently read: I think the last non-Aubrey and Maturin book I read was Ben Aaronovitch's latest Rivers of London novel, The Hanging Tree. I had mixed feelings. It wasn't a bad book by any means, and I love the series as a whole, and I love most of the characters, but the Faceless Man plot has dragged on far, far too long. I could just about live with that if the worldbuilding was still as good as it initially was, but I don't feel we've learned anything really interesting about magic for a couple of books now. I'm also uncomfortable with the way women's magic was handled in the book. It makes sense, given that women were excluded from formal training in the European magical system, that they would have developed their own tradition, but nevertheless something about "oh, women's magic is so natural and instinctive and not stuffy and academic!" makes me cringe. In fact everything about it makes me cringe. And finally, not enough Nightingale.
What I'm planning to read next: I'll probably finish the Aubrey and Maturin books before I move on. After that, I don't know.
Recently read: I think the last non-Aubrey and Maturin book I read was Ben Aaronovitch's latest Rivers of London novel, The Hanging Tree. I had mixed feelings. It wasn't a bad book by any means, and I love the series as a whole, and I love most of the characters, but the Faceless Man plot has dragged on far, far too long. I could just about live with that if the worldbuilding was still as good as it initially was, but I don't feel we've learned anything really interesting about magic for a couple of books now. I'm also uncomfortable with the way women's magic was handled in the book. It makes sense, given that women were excluded from formal training in the European magical system, that they would have developed their own tradition, but nevertheless something about "oh, women's magic is so natural and instinctive and not stuffy and academic!" makes me cringe. In fact everything about it makes me cringe. And finally, not enough Nightingale.
What I'm planning to read next: I'll probably finish the Aubrey and Maturin books before I move on. After that, I don't know.
no subject
Date: 2017-01-28 01:09 am (UTC)As regards Nightingale, I think maybe Aaronovitch is having the Charles Xavier problem. Nightingale is so powerful that he almost has to be sidelined for plots to work. *sadface* It's a pity in a characterization sense, too, because the Nightingale of the earlier books certainly had vulnerabilities, emotional if not magical, and those made him interesting.