If any of you who have me friended agree with this secret from today's
fandomsecrets, would you please defriend/unsubscribe me now?
Especially if I have you friended/subscribed/granted access back.
I don't want to associate with people who think I'm a liar who's just pretending to be trans in order to get male privilege.
(No, I haven't resumed reading fandomsecrets. But I saw this linked to, and foolishly followed the link, and now I am simultaneously enraged and horrified at the possibility that the OP, or one of the agreeing commenters, could be someone I know.)
ETA: My head aches and I'm tired, so I'm going to crawl into bed with a book. I mention this so you know why I won't be answering comments for the next 12 hours--it's not that I don't appreciate your support and general coolness.
Especially if I have you friended/subscribed/granted access back.
I don't want to associate with people who think I'm a liar who's just pretending to be trans in order to get male privilege.
(No, I haven't resumed reading fandomsecrets. But I saw this linked to, and foolishly followed the link, and now I am simultaneously enraged and horrified at the possibility that the OP, or one of the agreeing commenters, could be someone I know.)
ETA: My head aches and I'm tired, so I'm going to crawl into bed with a book. I mention this so you know why I won't be answering comments for the next 12 hours--it's not that I don't appreciate your support and general coolness.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 02:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 06:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 02:21 am (UTC)I sincerely hope that's nobody with any connection to my f'list. Considering the general persuasions of my flist, I doubt it, but even so...
no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 08:08 pm (UTC)In my case too. But the thought that it could be someone I know distantly--someone who reads and occasionally comments on my fic, for example--was upsetting.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 02:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 08:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 03:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 08:12 pm (UTC)It's very suspicion-inducing and anxiety-inducing, which is horrible.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 04:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 09:15 am (UTC)it holds out the idea that there is a "right kind" of transman, and if you just jumped through all their hoops...
The "right kind of trans*" thing is so... it's a wall-banger for me but sadly very pervasive. Most people even seem to have problems realising that, hey, access to hormones and surgery is MOSTLY OUT OF OUR HANDS. We could be the nicest, willingest, our-body-hatingest trans guys on earth but we still need to have a trans-friendly medical insurance, available therapists, money, time, mobility, other medical resources available, the goodwill of all the gatekeepers involved, and if/once all those boxes are checked we also need to be healthy enough to be ready for treatment (some trans people have allergies or chronic health conditions that prevent them from ever leaving the pre-hormones and pre-op stage).
Even in cases where they ARE aware of all this, then they usually remove their support when confronted with trans men who don't completely hate and detest their body every waking* minute, or who say they would like having biological kids, or who complain that having to have one's ovaries and uterus removed to be considered male (even though you cannot see them on the outside and they have stopped functioning due to testosterone) is violating their rights to bodily integrity. I've tried so many times to explain but it's like talking to a brick wall.
And what hurts the most is that this policing is coming not just from cis people, but from other trans folks, too.
* which reminds me: the "requirements" are so overwhelming and the trans narratives usually so narrow that I often felt guilty if I dreamed of myself in a female body instead of the male one I craved. They even police your SUBCONSCIOUS. How fucked-up is that.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 09:34 am (UTC)I'm cisgendered, but a lot of the gatekeeper/not real rhetoric overlaps with language and power structures around illness and disability, so it's not necessarily unfamiliar to me.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 03:25 pm (UTC)My personal knowledge is limited, but I've noticed some similarities too. The infantilizing, for example ("you can't know what's good for you, WE do"). Or how people have to walk a tightrope between being ill enough to "deserve" treatment but not so ill that they can't jump through the hoops as required. And don't get me started on unwanted advice...
no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 08:18 pm (UTC)I often felt guilty if I dreamed of myself in a female body instead of the male one I craved
So that's not just me, then? *laughs hollowly*
no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 08:45 pm (UTC)Of course, I also dreamt of being male sometimes. Or flying. Or the apocalypse. *shrug*
no subject
Date: 2010-07-09 05:22 pm (UTC)Yeah, I have tons of dreams that are about my anxieties, not my desires. So the fact that right after I bought my first men's clothes, I had two different dreams about wearing dresses . . . that's not my subconscious telling me I'm not trans, that's fears working themselves out.
I am SO TIRED of the "I always knew" narrative. I mean, if that's someone's experience, great. Yay them! But it's so past time for that to stop being the normative kind of transness. I'd love to see people who are in a place of relative safety (not, for example, in danger of losing access to medical treatment if they don't tell the right story about their identity) talking openly about having gone through uncertainty and self-doubt.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 08:16 pm (UTC)I think the "fandom lesbians" fail does the same thing, though, because it assumes that there's some "real" way to be a lesbian, that "fandom lesbians" aren't doing it, and that they're just pretending in order to get some sort of thrill or privilege (because being a lesbian or trans* brings SO MANY PRIVILEGES--I personally like the restaurant discounts!).
no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 04:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 08:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 07:49 am (UTC)I'm so sorry you had to encounter that.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 08:25 pm (UTC)If only. It's astounding how common the idea that it's white and/or male and/or straight and/or cisgendered people who are Truly Oppressed has become.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 08:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 11:29 pm (UTC)But, no, the OP is the arbiter of trans-ness and anyone who doesn't fit the OP's definition is a liar!
no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 08:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 11:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 09:29 am (UTC)P.S. this might be tangential, but my experience regarding gay males in slash fandom is that usually they are only appreciated [i.e. treated in a privileged fashion, fawned over, etc.] IF they are 1. cis, 2. giving slash writers tips on how to write m/m sex "realistically", 3. support all slash writers unconditionally. Otherwise they're mostly being told to GTFO. Which is not to say that no gay man ever behaved badly and unfairly towards or inside of slash fandom -- the issue defies easy categories as to who's "good" or "bad" -- but even the privilege we have as males in fandom comes with a lot of caveats because it's actually reserved mainly for a certain type of males only.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 11:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 01:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 02:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 02:58 pm (UTC)